What if.....3/24/09

What if Kristen Stewart could actually act......
From many of her movies that she starred in turned to crap because of her underacting. From The Safety of Objects by director Rose Troche and writer A. M. Homes to the new film Twilight by director Catherine Hardwicke and writer Melissa Rosenberg.
For those adults out there that don't know about Twilight is the new hit book and movie series that teens are just eating up. From my own opinion, Twilight is a good book for younger people like teens. But for adults, i advise you not to read it. You would be wasting your time. Twilight is poorly written. Teens will disagree but I am pretty sure I know when i read a poorly written novel. But that is just the novel.
The movie would have succeeded to at least a decent movie if Bella (Kristen Stewart) would have actually acted. Ruining many scenes in the movie. Edward (Robert Pattinson), everyone's favorite in the film-----besides his over acting, the intensity in his eyes is what got all these girls giddy over him.
Pattinson and Stewart together is a terrible combination when it comes to acting. With his over acting and her under acting, together they demeaned the movie of it's authenticity. But what really took the intensity away was Belle's crappy acting.
The one scene that really would have got my eye was when Edward blocked the van from hitting Belle. When he went to look down at her, the intensity of his eyes got me hooked to the screen. BUT once it turned to Belle, she looked scared, like she should have. I will give her props for that; it was just that she was not looking at Edward/the camera. SHE WAS LOOKING DOWN! That is when I turned my head from the screen in disgust. If I was Edward, I would have let that car hit her.
So, Catherine Hardwicke and Melissa Rosenberg, if I were you, I would be pissed. From what could have been at least a decent film, it became a load of crap scenes thrown together to a "film".